目的 探讨使用不同的手术方式治疗子宫肌瘤的临床效果。方法 选取2014年2月-2016年5月我院收治的51例子宫肌 瘤患者，按照住院顺序均分为A组和B组，A组患者为25例，B组患者为26例。A组患者使用开腹剔除术来进行治疗， B组患者使用宫腔镜剔除术来进行治疗，对比A、B两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间以及 治疗效果。结果 A组患者的出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间均高于B组患者，对比差异明显，存在统计学意义(P ＜0.05)。而B组患者的手术时间、治疗有效率明显高于A组患者，对比差异明显，存在统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 对子宫肌瘤进行治疗时，宫腔镜剔除术以及开腹剔除术都有各自的优势，在进行手术方式的选择时，应根据患者实 际情况进行选择。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the treatment of uterine fibroids using different surgical methods. Methods 51 cases of uterine fibroids were selected from February 2014 -2016 in May in our hospital, according to the order of hospitalization were divided into A group and B group, A group were 25 cases, B group of patients for 26 cases of. A patients with open myomectomy for treatment, B group were treated with hysteroscopic myomectomy for treatment, compared to A, B two groups of patients with blood loss, operative time, anal exhaust time, hospitalization time and treatment. Results The amount of bleeding in group A patients, flatus time, hospital stay were higher than group B patients, compared to obvious differences exist statistically significant (P<0.05). And group B patients with operation time, the treatment was significantly higher than in group A patients, significant differences in contrast, there is a statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The treatment of uterine fibroids, hysteroscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy has its own advantages, during the choice of surgical approach, patients should be selected according to the actual situation.