摘要
目的 探讨双能量CT与高频超声 诊断痛风性关节炎63例的临床价值。方 法 选取2013年05月至2015年06月间于我 院风湿免疫科就诊63例关节炎患者为研究 对象,分别对患者进行高频超声和320排 CT检查,观察比较两种方法对GA诊断的敏 感度、特异度、假阴性率、假阳性率、阳 性预测值、阴性预测值,同时对两种方法 检查GA一致性进行分析。结果 高频超声 和320排CT诊断GA的灵敏度、特异度、假 阳性率、假阴性率、阳性预测值、阴性预 测值分别为73.91%vs86.96%、82.35% vs 88.24%、17.65% vs 11.76%、26.09% vs 13.04%、91.89% vs 95.24%、53.85% vs 71.43%,两种方法比较差异具有统计学意 义(P<0.05)。两种方法诊断GA与临床诊断 标准对比绘制ROC曲线比较,高频超声ROC 曲线面积为0.79,320排CT ROC曲线面积 为0.92,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 两种方法检出尿酸结晶、骨质缺损、关 节积液的Kappa值分别为0.578、0.892、 0.824(P均<0.05)。结论 双能量CT与高频 超声对于GA的诊断均有较高的敏感性及特 异性,双能量CT在检测尿酸盐结晶较高频 超声具有更高灵敏度且能够更好的显示骨 质破坏情况及尿酸盐沉积情况。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of 320 slice CT and high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis (GA) in 63 cases. Methods A total of 63 arthritic patients treated in department of rheumatology in our hospital between May 2013 to June 2015 were selected for the study and were given high-frequency ultrasound and 320 slice CT respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, false positive rate, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the two methods in the diagnosis of GA were compared, and the consistency of the two methods in the diagnosis of GA was analyzed. Results There were statistically significant differences between high-frequency ultrasound and 320 slice CT in the sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of GA (73.91% VS 86.96%, 82.35% VS 88.24%, 17.65% VS 11.76%, 26.09% VS 13.04%, 91.89% VS 95.24%, 53.85% VS 71.43%) (P<0.05). The two methods were compared with the clinical diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of GA, and the ROC curve was drawn. The area under ROC curve of high-frequency ultrasound was 0.79, and the area of 320 slice CT was 0.92 (P<0.05). The Kappa values of the two methods in the diagnosis of uric acid crystals, bone defects and joint effusion were 0.578, 0.892 and 0.824, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of 320 slice CT and ultrasound are high in the diagnosis of GA. The sensitivity of 320 slice CT is higher than high-frequency ultrasound in the detection of uric acid crystals and it show the bone destruction and urate deposition better.
【关键词】双能量CT;高频超声;痛风性 关节炎;疗效
【中图分类号】R681.5+3
【文献标识码】A
【DOI】 10.3969/j.issn.1672- 5131.2018.05.041
前言
痛风性关节炎(GA)是临床常见关节疾病之一,其致病机制为关节 腔中尿酸(UA)增加导致单钠尿酸盐(MSU)沉积所致,常引起多个器官、 组织受累[1-3]。研究显示,GA在普通人群的发病率为0.2‰~0.35‰, 且男性高于女性,随着年龄增长GA发病率逐渐升高[4]。而临床上常将 血尿酸升高作为诊断GA重要依据,但高尿酸血症发展成GA所占比例为 5%~12%[5]。目前,通风的诊断一直沿用国外标准[6]:为关节液诊断有 MSU或具备6项及以上临床、实验室、X线表现即可确诊为痛风,但仍有 部分患者会出现诊断不明或误诊。近年来,影像学(X线、CT、MRI及超 声检查)的发展能够帮助临床医师诊断及评价GA,双能量CT扫描对痛 风的诊断特异性较高、且能清晰显示痛风伴随的骨质破坏,但存在辐 射[7-8],超声无辐射,对软组织、晶体物质的显示较敏感,但存在视野 小、检验效能受检查医生水平限制的缺点[9]。因此,临床上寻找一种 简便、快速、无创性检测方法在诊断痛风疾病中具有重要意义。本研 究通过探讨GA患者不同影像学表现,并比较两种检查方法对GA的诊断 价值。
中国CT和MRI杂志
第16卷, 第 5 期
2018年05月
相关文章