简体中文

论著-头颈部

椎体脆性骨折多模 态影像的诊断价值 比较

作者:张雪琴1 程晓光2 甘利伟1 汪晓琴1

所属单位:1.重庆市北碚区中医院医学影像科 (重庆 400700) 2.北京积水潭医院放射科 (北京 100035)

PDF

摘要

目的 对比研究椎体脆性骨折 (骨质疏松性骨折)的X线平片、CT及MRI 等多模态影像的诊断价值。方法 回顾性 分析78例经我院诊治的椎体脆性骨折的 X线平片、CT及MRI影像资料,比较其诊 断价值。结果 78例共计发生椎体新鲜脆 性骨折118处,其中单发椎体骨折52例 (66.7%),多发椎体骨折26例(33.3%)。 MRI诊断椎体新鲜骨折118处,无漏诊; CT诊断椎体新鲜骨折90个,漏诊28个, 漏诊率23.7%(28/118);X线平片诊断椎 体新鲜骨折或形态变扁83个,漏诊48 个,漏诊率40.7%(48/118)。结论 MRI可 鉴别新鲜骨折与陈旧性骨折,是诊断椎 体脆性骨折的最佳影像检查方法;CT检 查漏诊率较高, X线平片漏诊率最高。

Objective To compare the diagnostic value of X-ray plain films, CT and MRI images of fragile vertebral fractures (osteoporotic fractures). Methods The imaging findings of X-ray plain film, CT and MRI in 78 cases diagnosed as brittle fracture of vertebral body were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic value of three methods for brittle fracture of vertebral body were contrastive studied. Results There were 118 fresh brittle fractures of the vertebral body in 78 cases, of which 52 cases were single vertebral fracture (66.7%), and 26 cases were multiple vertebral fractures (33.3%). MRI diagnosed 118 cases of fresh vertebral fractures without missed diagnosis. CT diagnosed 90 cases of fresh vertebral fractures with missed diagnosis of 28 cases, missed diagnosis rate 23.7% (28/118); X-ray plain film diagnosis of fresh vertebral fractures or flatting 83, 48 missed diagnosis, missed diagnosis rate 40.7% (48/118). Conclusion In the diagnosis of vertebral fragile fracture, MRI is helpful for differentiating fresh fracture from old fracture and it is the best imaging method. The missed diagnosis rate of CT is high, and the rate of missed diagnosis is the highest.

【关键词】脆性骨折;椎体;X线平片; 计算机断层扫描;磁共振成像

【中图分类号】R681;R445.2

【文献标识码】A

【DOI】 10.3969/j.issn.1672- 5131.2018.05.045

前言

骨质疏松症(osteoporosis,OP)是以骨量减少,骨质量受损及骨 强度减低而致骨脆性增加、易发生骨折为特征的一种全身性骨病。骨 质疏松症已是全球性的公共健康问题,而椎体脆性骨折(骨质疏松性骨 折)是骨质疏松症最常见的严重并发症,其将严重影响老年人的生活 质量并增加病死率。因此,对于椎体脆性骨折的早期准确诊断至关重 要。周所周知X线及CT在椎体脆性骨折诊断上存在漏诊[1-2],而MRI不仅 能发现隐匿性骨折、还可鉴别椎体急性和亚急性脆性骨折[3]。本文旨 在探讨椎体脆性骨折的多模态影像(X线平片、CT及MRI)表现,对其诊 断价值进行评估。