目的 研究并观察临床路径在哮喘病患者护理中的应用效果。方法 选择我院2011年5月至2013年2月呼吸内科收治的 哮喘病患者72例，采用随机抽样法分为观察组与对照组各36例。给予观察组患者临床护理路径进行护理干预，给予 对照组患者常规护理干预，观察对比两组患者的临床护理效果。结果 观察组32例患者临床症状得到明显改善，平 均住院时间为(10.2±2.1)天；对照组23例患者临床症状得到明显改善，平均住院时间为(15.3±1.6)天。观察组患 者的护理效果较对照组更好，两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的护理满意度为97.22%，对照组患 者的护理满意度为77.78%，观察组患者的护理满意度较对照组明显更高，两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结 论 对于哮喘病患者采用临床路径进行护理，可以提高患者参与度并形成主动护理的模式，值得大力推广。

Objective To study and observe the clinical pathways in the application of nursing care in patients with asthma. Methods Seventy - two patients with asthma were admitted to our hospital from May, 2011 to February, 2013 and divided into observation group and control group by random sampling. Nursing intervention was given to the clinical nursing pathways of the patients in the observation group, the routine nursing intervention was given to the control group, and the clinical nursing effect of the two groups was observed and compared. Results The clinical symptoms of the 32 patients in the observation group were significantly improved, with an average hospital stay of (10.2 ± 2.1) days. In the control group, the clinical symptoms were improved in 23 cases (15.3 ± 1.6) days. The nursing effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was 97.22%, and the satisfaction degree of the control group was 77.78%. The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical pathways of patients with asthma can improve the participation of patients and form active nursing model, which is worth popularizing.