目的 分析两种术式对小儿疝气患儿预后恢复效果和并发症发生率的影响。方法 选取我院2013年3月-2015年12月收 治的疝气患儿84例为研究对象，采用随机分组法分为腹腔镜手术治疗（实验组，n=42）和传统手术治疗（对照组， n=42）。观察并比较两组患儿预后恢复情况和并发症发生率差异。结果 实验组术后排气时间、术后自主活动时 间、住院时间、切口愈合时间均较对照组短（P＜0.05），实验组术后1年内阴囊肿胀、腹胀、切口感染、疝复发发 生率均低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 腹腔镜手术较传统手术对小儿疝气患儿创伤小，病情恢复快且不易复发，预 后效果好，并发症发生风险也明显低于传统手术，对患儿病情恢复与预后状态更有利。

Objective To analyze the effects of two surgical procedures on prognoses and complication rates in children with hernia. Methods From Mar. 2013 to Dec. 2015, 84 children with hernia in our hospital were selected as the research objects, and they were randomly divided into experimental group (laparoscopic surgery, n=42) and control group (conventional surgery, n=42). The prognoses and complication rates in the two groups were observed and compared. Results The postoperative exhaust time, postoperative voluntary activity time, hospitalization time and wound healing time in the experimental group were all shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05), the incidence rates of scrotal swelling, abdominal distension, incisional infection and hernia recurrence in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group within 1 years (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional surgery, laparoscopic surgery which is more favorable for the recovery and prognosis, has the advantages of smaller trauma, rapider recovery, less recurrence, better prognosis, and lower risk of complications for children with hernia.