目的比较MRI与超声在宫颈癌临 床诊断、分期及宫旁侵犯评估中的应用效 果。方法 将2016年1月至2017年12月来我 院就诊的106例疑似宫颈病变患者纳入本 研究，所有入选者均同时接受MRI与阴道 彩色多普勒超声检查，比较MRI与超声检 查结果。结果 MRI诊断宫颈癌灵敏度和准 确率均显著高于超声(P＜0.05)；MRI对宫 颈癌临床分期的准确率显著高于超声(P ＜0.01)；MRI对宫颈癌宫旁侵犯的诊断准 确率显著高于超声(P＜0.05)。结论 MRI 在宫颈癌临床诊断、分期及宫旁侵犯评估 中准确性高于超声，可为宫颈癌的临床诊 治提供可靠依据。

Objective To explore the effects for the patients with cervical carcinoma on clinical diagnosis, stages, collateral damage assessment by MRI and ultrasound. Methods 106 cases of patients who suspected cervical lesions were researched. They were tested by MRI and ultrasound. The tested results were observed. Results The sensitivity and accuracy for the tested results of MRI were higher than ultrasound(P＜0.05). The accuracy on clinical stages for the tested results of MRI were were higher than ultrasound(P＜0.05). The accuracy on cervical cancer for the tested results of MRI were were higher than ultrasound(P＜0.05). Conclusion It has more accurate of MRI than ultrasound in clinical diagnosis, staging and collateral damage evaluation of cervical cancer, it can provide reliable basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer.