论著-头颈部
扩散加权成像对乳 腺非肿块型浸润性 导管癌及导管原位 癌的量化分析及诊 断价值*
作者:李 晏 郑晓林 刘碧华 邹玉坚 叶瑞婷 邓 磊 范宪淼
所属单位:广东省东莞市人民医院放射科 (广东 东莞 523000)
PDF摘要
目的 探讨3.0TMR扩散加权成像 不同b值的信号强度下降率及ADC值对乳腺 非肿块型浸润性导管癌及导管原位癌的 诊断价值。方法 收集东莞市人民医院自 2014年6月至2016年12月经手术病理证实 的非肿块型浸润性导管癌78例,导管原 位癌32例,术前均行3.0T MR DWI扫描, b值取0、500、800s/mm2 ,分别测量不同b 值下乳腺病灶DWI信号强度和b=800s/mm2 时病灶ADC值,计算DWI信号强度下降率 (SIDR),SIDR=(低b值DWI病灶信号强度- 高b值DWI病灶信号强度)/低b值DWI病灶信 号强度)。对所获得的资料采用两独立样 本t检验进行统计学分析。结果 (1)b=0、 500、800s/mm2 ,乳腺非肿块型浸润性导 管癌及导管原位癌两组间DWI信号强度值 均无统计学意义(P>0.05);(2)0-500、 500-800s/mm2 两组b值间乳腺非肿块型浸 润性导管癌及导管原位癌组间SIDR差异 无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)b=800s/ mm2 时,乳腺非肿块型浸润性导管癌及导 管原位癌的ADC值差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 不同b值的信号强度及下 降率对乳腺非肿块型浸润性导管癌及导管 原位癌的鉴别诊断不足以作为参考依据, b=800s/mm2 时ADC值具有参考价值。
Objective To investigate the diagnosis efficiency of decline rate of signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) with different b values for differentiating breast non-mass invasive ductal carcinoma(IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) on diffusion-weighted 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging. Methods Collecting 78 cases of non-mass IDC and 32 cases of DCIS from June 2014 to December 2016 in Dongguan People's Hospital. All patients underwent 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging scan before operation, three b values (0,500,800s/mm2 ) were used. The signal intensity with different b value and ADC values with b value(800 s/mm2 )of breast cancers were measured respectively. The signal intensity decline rate(SIDR) was calculated. SIDR=(signal intensity of lesions with low b value- signal intensity of lesions with high b value)/ signal intensity of lesions with low b value. The independent sample t-test was employed for statistical analyses. Results (1) Non significant differences were observed in signal intensity between breast non-mass IDC and DCIS with b values of 0,500,800s/mm2 (P>0.05); (2) Non significant differences were observed in SIDR between breast non-mass IDC and DCIS with b values of 0-500,500-800s/mm2 (P>0.05); (3) Significant difference was observed in ADC value between breast non-mass IDC and DCIS with b values of 800s/ mm2 (P<0.05). Conclusion The signal intensity and decline rate with different b values may be not used for differentiating breast non-mass IDC and DCIS now; ADC value has some reference value with b value of 800s/mm2 .
【关键词】乳腺癌;磁共振成像;扩散加 权;信号强度;ADC值
【中图分类号】R737.9;R445.2
【文献标识码】A
【DOI】 10.3969/j.issn.1672- 5131.2019.05.026
前言
乳腺癌是女性最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,已发展为目前全球范 围女性肿瘤死亡的首要疾病[1]。由于乳腺癌中导管原位癌(ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS)和浸润性导管癌(invasive ductal carcinoman,IDC)的治疗和转归有着显著性差异,且近年来导管原位 癌的检出率超过新发乳腺癌的20%[2],因此DCIS的早期检出及准确诊断 尤为重要。肿块型乳腺癌的影像诊断相对成熟,非肿块型乳腺癌的研 究近年来也逐渐增多,DCIS多以非肿块强化为主要表现[2]。扩散加权 成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)是在乳腺方面应用最广的一 种功能成像。以往研究表明随着b值增加乳腺良、恶性病变的信号强度 及表观扩散系数(Apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)值均呈下降 趋势,但关于不同病理类型的非肿块型乳腺癌的DWI信号强度及ADC值 文献报道不多,因此本研究旨在探讨不同b值下的信号强度及信号强度 下降率(signal intensity decline rate,SIDR)、ADC值对乳腺非肿 块型IDC及DCIS的诊断价值。
中国CT和MRI杂志
第17卷, 第 5 期
2019年05月
相关文章