摘要
目的 对比全飞秒激光小切口角膜微透镜取出术(SMILE)与半飞秒激光制瓣联合准分子激光(FS-LASIK)两种手术方式 治疗近视及散光术后的干眼情况。方法 选取2017年9月-2018年9月我院近视中心行激光治疗近视的患者68例,分为 SMILE组及FA-LASIK组,两组患者分别进行相应的激光治疗近视手术,进行为期6个月的随访,比较两组手术术后的 泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)及泪液分泌量(Schirmer I试验)。结果 结果显示,两组患者术后早期的泪液分泌情况与泪膜 破裂时间均比术前显著下降,随时间延长有逐步恢复的迹象。而FS-LAISK的TBUT及泪液分泌情况均显著低于SMILE 组,两者间有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论 SMILE手术与FS-LASIK相比,对术后干眼影响更小。
Objective To compare the dry eye situations after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASKI) for myopia. Methods 68 myopic patients in our hospital from September 2017 to September 2018 were selected and divided into SMILE group(38 cases) and FS-LASIK(30 cases). SMILE group was underwent SMILE surgery while FS-LASIK group was underwent FS-LASIK surgery. The tearbreak-up-test(TBUT) and Schirmer I test at 1-month, 3-month and 6-month after surgery were compared between the two group. Results The results that TBUT and Schirmer I test were both significantly lower than preoperative levels in both groups and recovered over time. Both of them recovered faster in SMILE group than in FS-LASIK group and the difference is significant(P<0.05). Conclusion SMILE surgery is better than FS-LASIK surgery in the matter of dry eye.
【关键词】近视;干眼;近视手术
【中图分类号】R778.1+1
【文献标识码】A
【DOI】10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2019.03.009
前言
在全球范围内,屈光不正均是引起视力损害的最 主要原因[1]。随着现代眼科显微手术的快速发展,角 膜屈光手术的理论不断发展以及新技术的完善,由于 其安全性及有效性被广大群众所接受,但因术中损伤 了角膜的神经纤维,尤其是在早期角膜神经仍未修复 时,患者的干眼症状通常比较明显。近年来,全飞秒 激光小切口角膜微透镜取出术(SMILE)进入了人们的 视野,因其微创性对角膜损伤更小,一面世即被广大 医生及患者接受[2]。从理论上说,因SMILE手术的微 创性,术后干眼的情况会较传统大切口制瓣的半飞秒 激光制瓣联合准分子激光(FS-LASIK)手术轻。临床上 对此类连续随访跟踪的文章较少,本研究拟比较全飞 秒小切口角膜微透镜取出术与传统的术后干眼情况。
罕少疾病杂志
第26卷, 第 3 期
2019年05月
相关文章