目的 探讨规范化教育管理对支气管哮喘患者病情控制和生命质量的效果。方法 选择我院2013年2月至2014年 2月的100例支气管哮喘患者，以接受规范性教育管理者52例为观察组，剩余48例为对照组，对两组患者病情 控制结果及生活质量评分进行比较。结果 观察组哮喘完全控制35例，良好控制14例，总控制率94.23%；对照 组哮喘完全控制23例，良好控制15例，总控制率79.17%，观察组哮喘总控制率明显高于对照组，差异有统计 学意义，X2 =5.01，p＜0.05(p=0.02)。另外，两组生命质量总评分比较差异有统计学意义，观察组患者的心 理状况评分为(27.04±3.14)，对照组患者的评分为(21.15±5.65)，P＜0.05；观察组患者的哮喘症状评分为 (36.55±3.60)，对照组评分为(26.37±5.51)，P＜0.05；观察组患者的保健意识评分为(15.01±3.80)，对照组评 分为(11.41±4.89)，P＜0.05；观察组患者的活动受限评分为(49.96±5.60)，对照组患者评分为(39.98±7.63)， P＜0.05；观察组患者的刺激原反应评分为(23.34±2.35)，对照组患者的评分为(11.41±4.89)，P＜0.05；观察组 患者的总分为(151.83±12.82)，对照组患者的评分为(116.86±20.65)，P＜0.05。结论 加强支气管哮喘患者规划 化教育管理，不仅可以有效控制哮喘病情，而且可以提高患者生命质量，值得临床推广。

Objective To investigate the standardize management to the disease control and life quality in patients with bronchial asthma. Methods Randomly select 100 cases of bronchial asthma patients of our hospital from February 2013 to February 2014, in which 52 cases received the standardize management as the study group, the remaining 48 cases as the control group, the results for the two groups of patients with disease control and life quality scores were compared. Results A total of 35 cases were complete control in study group, 14 cases were well-controlled , the total control rate was 94.23%; 23 cases were complete control in control group , 15 cases were well control,the total control rate was 79.17%. The observation group was significantly higher than the overall control of asthma control group, the difference was statistically significant, X2 5.01, P=0.02 <0.05. In addition, the overall quality of life scores between the two groups were statistically significant differences in psychological status of patients in the observation group score of 27.04 ± 3.14, in the control group of patients a score of 21.15 ± 5.65, P <0.05; observed in patients with asthma symptom score was 36.55 ± 3.60, in the control group score was 26.37 ± 5.51, P <0.05; health conscious observation group were rated 15.01 ± 3.80, in the control group score was 11.41 ± 4.89, P <0.05; observed in patients with limited mobility group score was 49.96 ± 5.60 in the control group of patients rated 39.98 ± 7.63, P<0.05; observation group were stimulated original reaction rated 23.34 ± 2.35, in the control group of patients rated 11.41 ± 4.89, P <0.05; observe patients total score of 151.83 ± 12.82, a control group of patients rated 116.86 ± 20.65, P <0.05. Conclusion Strengthen the education management to the bronchial asthma patients can effectively control asthma and improve the quality of life at the same time.